Archive for July, 2005

Unger’s Method of Opposition

Saturday, July 30th, 2005

Peter Unger, in his book _Ignorance_, uses the method of opposition to argue that knowledge implies certainty. Some subtleties aside, Unger appeals to the strangeness of assertions like ‘I know it’s raining, but I’m not certain it is’ to argue for this thesis. There’s a problem, however, with this strategy: assertion carries more information than the content of the claim itself. For example, the assertion that “it’s raining” carries the implications that (a) it’s relevant to discourse and (b) that the asserter is—at least—justified in believing that it’s raining. (more…)

Types of Perceptual Awareness

Saturday, July 16th, 2005

The concept of awareness is crucial for epistemology, and yet there is much left to be desired in discussions that incorporate the notion of awareness. I discuss some of this in my paper “Acquaintance and the Problem of the Speckled Hen” (forthcoming with Phil Studies). The problem of the speckled hen shows just how hard it is to get the right kind of awareness for perceptual justification. I’m becoming more convinced that we need a much more nuanced account of the different kinds of awareness. The following (more…)

Tuesday, July 12th, 2005

I would like to hear your thoughts on an argument against expressivism. I’ve switched the example sentences, but the basic line of reasoning is from Peter Geach. (more…)