Archive for May, 2005

Why late-term abortions are morally wrong: part deux

Wednesday, May 18th, 2005

OK, in an earlier post I presented an anological induction that showed that late-term abortions are morally wrong. After much helpful dialogue, the discussion was stymied. Here I present an updated version of the argument that incorporates earlier criticisms and fleshes out some of my earlier equivocations.

1) For any X, if (α) it would be wrong to kill X if X were outside of the mother and (β) it is possible for the mother to “unattach herself” from X without killing X, then it is prima facie morally wrong to abort X.

2) Most 6, 7, 8 and 9 month-old fetuses meet both α and β.

3) Therefore, most abortions on 6,7,8 and 9-month old fetuses are prima facie morally wrong.

Inductive arguments are somewhat sloppy, so this is a deduction meant to clarify the earlier inconsistencies. (more…)

Construct an argument…

Friday, May 13th, 2005

I offer a bit of an “unwinding” activity for everyone as the semester winds down. I have in mind an argument along the following lines:

1) If X is a Mizzou philosophy grad student, then X should enjoy their summer.
2) X is a Mizzou philosophy grad student.
3) Therefore, X should enjoy their summer.

Using whatever definitions, operaters, quantifiers, etc., that you need, I am curious who can make (more…)

Why late-term abortions are morally wrong.

Saturday, May 7th, 2005

The reason is simple: it’s the intentional killing of a human child. Here’s the argument:

1) It is morally wrong to kill human infants.
2) A late-term fetus is relevantly similar to a human infant.
3) So, it’s morally wrong to kill late-term fetuses.

Granting that abortions on late-term fetuses kill (more…)

The relevance of counterfactual dependence to providing a best explanation

Thursday, May 5th, 2005

I’m puzzling over the relationship between “best explanation” and counterfactual dependence. I hope to get some of your thoughts on the following:

Consider that I have the virtue of tenacity and am testing chemicals for dangerous properties. There is a particular chemical called “Lookssafe” which I understand to be 99.9 percent likely to not contain dangerous properties. As I lay asleep at night in my laboratory, (more…)

Anarchy: A Vision of the Just Society

Wednesday, May 4th, 2005

I hear through the grapevine that a few of my more conservative colleagues are interested in what my view of the just society consists in. So, I thought that I would outline the main features of my view and then we could have a discussion about them.

As most of you know, I am an Anarchist (more…)