<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Show-Me the Argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me</link>
	<description>The weblog of Mizzou philosophy grads</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>new administrator</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=557</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=557#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to announce that Peter Abram is now the new administrator of Show Me the Argument!  Peter is a first year graduate student here at University of Missouri.  Shaun stepped down last year, and I am now as well.  Hopefully, we&#8217;ll be able to block out all those spam comments soon.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=557</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCP 2009</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=556</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=556#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences and Calls for Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justin McBrayer, a Mizzou alum and former Show Me administrator, is hosting the 2009 Western meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers at Fort Lewis College.Â  See here for more information.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=556</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Eastern APA</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=554</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=554#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences and Calls for Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Leiter posted a link to the following: here and here.
I&#8217;ve never been to an APA, but the discussions give me a bad impression.Â  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a much more positive side as well.
edit
More interesting stuff on apa.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=554</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knowledge and Doubt</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=553</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=553#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the following ascription seem infelicitous?
&#8220;Fred knows that Sally loves him, but he has a little bit of doubt that she does&#8221;
How about the following?
&#8220;Fred believes that Sally loves him. Indeed, he knows that she loves him, but he has a little bit of doubt that she loves him only because of an unconscious fear [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=553</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatism is not a theory of propositional justification</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=551</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatism is often defined as follows:
(C) If S believes that p, then, in the absence of defeaters, S thereby has at least some degree of justification for believing that p.
I will now give a rough characterization of the distinction between propositional and doxastic justification for p.  For S to have propositional justification for her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=551</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mirror Argument (for Phil. of Sci. seminar)</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=550</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=550#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>liu</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ariew Seminar (Fall 08)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the paper I presented in the Phil. of Sci. seminar where we had no time for discussion. Would love to hear comments from you guys, both people in the seminar and those who are not. (This is a part of the practice for the seminar, and the paper is rather too long for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=550</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knowledge Without Evidence</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=549</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=549#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an earlier post, http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=138#more-138, I followed Plantinga in arguing that our memorial beliefs constitute cases of knowledge without evidence.Â  I still think this is right, but I&#8217;m going to try to pull from a new set of cases.
Some of my knowledge is inferred from other beliefs; this is the case for my knowledge that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=549</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stereotypes</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=548</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=548#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m trying to understand what a stereotype is.Â  My guess is that the word has different senses, and there will be some need to make distinctions as the discussion progresses.
1) S is a stereotype if and only if S is a universal generalization about a group of people.
But consider the universal generalization: &#8220;All White people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=548</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grossness</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=547</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=547#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Moon</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m wondering whether the following analysis of correct:
S&#8217;s utterance of the sentenceÂ &#8221;x is gross&#8221; is true if and only if S has a disgusting feel upon considering x.
On this view, the truth value of grossness ascriptions is dependent on who makes them.Â Â By &#8220;disgusting feel&#8221;Â I am refering toÂ that feeling we are all aware of, the feeling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=547</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Worlds</title>
		<link>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=546</link>
		<comments>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=546#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Marshall</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?p=546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the truth value of &#8220;My avatar in Doom has hands&#8221;? The world of Doom seems pretty real when I&#8217;m playing it, but it only exists as pixels on the screen and bits in my computer&#8217;s memory. Yet including my avatar&#8217;s hands and other game-world objects in my ontology makes it easier to make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://philosophy.missouri.edu/show-me/?feed=rss2&amp;p=546</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
